Auschwitz
Today we woke up early for our trip to Auschwitz. We ate breakfast at our hotel in Krakow and hopped on the bus for an hour long drive. We started off at Auschwitz birkenau, which was known as the death camp. The death camp’s sole purpose was to annihilate the Jews of Europe. Those who were chosen for life were taken hostage until their death. When we arrived the first sight in plain view was the famous long building with an arch in the middle separating both sides of the building. This is the first thing that shoah victims would also see. The building has railroad tracks on both sides, where prisoners would arrive on cattle cars. These cars were meant for exporting cows to farms, but the Nazis used them to store Jews for rides from 3 hours to 3 weeks. Up to 100 (or maybe more) would be stuffed inside of the cars, sources state that it was hot inside of them and very claustrophobic.
After learning about the cattle cars and the selection process we walked over to the destroyed gas chambers and learned about the ponds, which were used to dump ashes in. The vast majority of the Jews brought to Birkenau we're brought directly from the selection ramp to their death at the gas chambers. Over 1 million Jews were murdered here.
We learned about a lot of stories about Iberleben as well. The most impactful story that we learned about was about Roman Frister who was raped in the middle of the night by his block guard (who was also a Jew.) After the rape the guard took his cap, so Frister took another man's cap since you couldn’t show up to morning lineup without a cap. If you did so, you would get shot. Frister says that when he heard a gunshot he looked down. Another remarkable story was about Azriel David Fastag who said “אני מאמין” -----> (I believe) and started chanting a song about believing in the cattle car on the way to Treblinka. He was known to be very charismatic and his chant spread, soon a bunch of people started singing אני מאמין. I think it’s really inspiring that one can even find hope during a time like that.
Before our ceremony we made our way over to “The Sauna” which is where victims who were chosen for life would be taken after selection. All victims would have their hair shaved off, in ways that were purposely very painful. Victims reported that people couldn’t recognize each other let alone themselves after the cuts. The part that really hit home for me was learning about how they would make people take showers. Crammed together in a big room with multiple shower heads, the nazis would torture people, making the water freezing cold, scorching hot, or start off with freezing water and then change it to scorching water and then back to freezing water. I don’t know if anyone reading this has ever experienced this but it's so painful. I have had this happen to me but not nearly as bad. I can’t imagine what they had to go through. Before entering gas chambers everyone would have to strip naked, and have all of their personal belongings taken from them including gold teeth/dentures if they had. Nazis would then assess what would be steamed and sent to Germany. The nazis were really making a profit off of people. One major story that we learned about was the Sonderkommando Revolt. A group of people who united and somehow made contact with woman working in a munition factory near Auschwitz. The materials that they collected was used over a period of time to create grenades that would destroy gas chamber #4
After “The Sauna” we had time to walk around or just sit down and write/process everything. To conclude our time in Birkenau both classes united for our ceremony. Then we went to lunch before Auschwitz 1. Auschwitz 1 was known as the concentration camp. Auschwitz 1 was made into multiple exhibits in each block. I was pretty shocked when arriving...How could this place have been a camp filled of terror? To me, it looked far more like a college campus than somewhere where people were worked to their death. The exhibits were insightful. If I’m speaking on behalf of many people in the class, one of the most surprising and petrifying aspect was the mountain of woman hair. I observed it for a while and it stood out to me so much because although it was almost like looking at a sea of brown strands, I saw a couple of chopped off braids, ponytails, etc. that looked like the shade of my hair. My hair holds a really strong place on how I think I view myself to the world. So many beautiful woman had to get their hair taken away from them, for the sole purpose of making objects like furniture. Other exhibits we saw included pictures that children in the Shoah drew-pictures that contained drawings of nazis holding guns, people being hung, and sentimental notes to loved ones, such as a rose with the writing under it “My beloved Mother.” That kid probably never saw his mother again. When people think about the Holocaust they think about a genocide against Jewish people. While this is true, other people were targeted and killed by the Nazis. Some of these people were disabled, gypsies, homosexuals, black people and anyone that imposed a political threat to Nazi Germany. Hitler's ideology was to wipe out anyone who didn’t present the basic European features or principles that he wanted to enforce. At the end of Auschwitz we went to the gas chamber. After, Zach pointed out that there were claw marks on the wall. I missed those. A part of me wishes that I got to see them while another part of me is happy I missed that horrendous site. How does one even make a mark on a concrete wall? If that doesn’t scream suffering than I don’t know what does.
I want to know your opinion on what Roman Frister did. Do you consider his actions an act of justification or sin? Please explain why. Also, if you could ask one question to a victim in Auschwitz what would you ask?
-GOLDIE ELKINS
I know this may sound like a strange question, buy what I would ask is for a favorite happy memory, because even in a place like Auschwitz where the entire time everything was miserable and surrounded by death there must have been something positive that pushed them forward, like the jokes they used to make. But honestly I would ask so much more than just one question because it is absolutely impossible for me to imagine life in Auschwitz yet people lived, and survived!
ReplyDeleteI am not sure how I feel about Roman Foster. He ended a life but he saved his own. Either way, a life would have been lost, the question is just on whose. To me, he killed a man. However, this is a situation where barbaric human instincts begin to show. Kill or be killed. If I could ask any auchwitz victim a question it would be this: How did you create moments of hope within your time in the holocaust?
ReplyDeleteI think what Roman Frister did was fine. Of course it’s not a good thing to indirectly end someone’s life but he saved his own. In the end Jews would be down a life and I’m glad he survived and lived into his 90s and had kids and grandkids which proves that some good could have came out of it. If he took the shot, the guy with the hat could’ve been killed the est day. It was a risk but an act of iberlaben.
ReplyDeleteMy question to an Auschwitz victim would be “How?” How did this happen to you? How was this place a reality?
I have no place to judge whether I think what Frister did was a sin or justification. He survived and not many people were able to. He killed a man and that's not excusable. He also created a family and continued some Jewish legacy. There is good and bad. If I could ask a Jew from Auschwitz anything, I would ask them if they were able to have any happiness.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Beca, I have absolutely no right or place to judge what Frister did during his time in Aushwitz. However, I can say that it was incredibly brave and very powerful to hear his accounts of what took place and what actions he took. I feel that the biggest take away anyone should have from this story was the importance of iberlaben and how the Holocaust brought such extreme actions. It's also important to note that the difference between Frister and the other Jews during the time, who also committed acts of iberlaben all, is that Frister was one of the few souls who survived and could accept and say what he did.
ReplyDelete- Also if I were to ask a Jew from Auschwitz anything, I would ask about what he or she lost not just physically, but emotionally and what of his or her identity.
ReplyDeleteI think that Roman Frister was completely justified for what he did. I think that if doing what he did is what it takes to survive one more day, then go for it. Although it is terrible to have to end someone's life for your own, in the situation he was in, I would have done the same thing. My question for a survivor would be: How did you keep fighting to survive when all that surrounded you was death?
ReplyDeleteI understand what Roman Frister did, and I think it is a horrible deed to do and I'm not sure if I could do it, but I do not think you can blame him. When there is that much dehuminization in a place, it is easy to not even see it as killing someone. How can you kill someone who you can barely recognize as human anymore? I think that it means the Nazis succeeded in that aspect, but the Nazis unfortunately succeeded in many. If I could ask a survivor any question, it would be: When did you first feel recognized as a human again, and did you ever feel whole again?
ReplyDeleteI agree with kate and beca, how could someone like me possibly judge the decision of a person in his place? I couldn't possibly begin to understand what that must have been like. And if I could as a question I would say, " do you want to go to lunch sometime?" Because I wouldn't want to ask about their time in Aucshwitz, as to not bring them back to that horrible place but to remind them they are safe.
ReplyDeleteI am not sure. When I was in Hebrew school as a 10 year old, we talked about weird things that exist in Jewish law. One of the things we talked about was preservation of your life over someone else's. My teacher said that if there a choice, you die or someone else does, you consider the circumstance. In that case, Roman Frister did not consider the circumstance of his life compared to the other man who was killed in his place. He valued his own life solely for the purpose of self - preservation.
ReplyDeleteI believe that Roman Frister's actions were justified by the fact that he survived. In Auschwitz and Majdanek, people's identities were taken away and they were treated like animals. It was the primal instinct of survival that the survivors had that kept them going. These people could not count on humanity to survive.
ReplyDeleteIf I were to ask a survivor of Auschwitz anything I would ask them what their motive was to survive. I would ask them this because they could not just survive with physical strength alone because in the end everyone was weak no matter who you were.
I don't think Roman's actions can be judged. None of us will ever understand the suffering and the struggles he had to go through every day just to stay alive. I can't say I would do anything different in his position, other than die a lot earlier.
ReplyDeleteIf I could ask one question to a survivor, I would ask how they never gave in. Making it through each day had to have been a struggle. How could they manage to do that day after day? Would they not reach a point where they felt they would rather die than continue? How did they push those thoughts away and keep going?
that kinda turned into a bunch of questions. Oops.
DeleteI am still unsure on how I feel about Roman Frister. It goes without saying that what he did was brave. But I am still unsure whether or not what he did was justified. Afterall, he did take a life. If I could ask any question to someone who survived in Auschwitz would be, what made you keep going and what was something you learned while you were there?
ReplyDelete